ON-160143

Castello Di Neive Barbaresco 2006, Docg

Barbaresco (Nebbiolo) Barbaresco (Nebbiolo)
Piedmont, Italy

$19.80 (160143)

  • None
     
  • Drink Now Or Cellar
  • 8989
89 pts
5

Critic Reviews (1)

Margaret Swaine
Read-reviews
Margaret Swaine

Just released on general list, this Piedmont region red from nebbiolo grapes is an amazing value that I highly...

Sign In to see Critic Reviews. Not a Member? Please Sign Up.
Sign In to see Critic Reviews. Not a Member? Please Sign Up.
  • Thumbs-up (1)
  • Thumbs-down (0)

Community Reviews (4)

Matthew Shannon
8888
  • Thumbs-up (0)
  • Thumbs-down (0)
It's only wine but I like it
It's only wine but I like it

Inexpensive by Barbaresco standards, this still exhibits many of the hallmarks of Nebbiolo: cherry fruit, a bit of tartness and floral aromas. I also detected a touch of oak on the nose. Of course, at this price, one does not expect huge depth or complexity. Rather, think of this is a Nebbiolo-lite. Decent value and a very good food wine. Drink now or over the next couple of years. Tasted Dec 2011.

8888
  • Thumbs-up (0)
  • Thumbs-down (0)
Dan Trcka
Dan Trcka

This value Barbaresco has a light body and integrated yet very subtle notes of raspberry, pine and liquorice. Tannins are subtle to refined (decant for 30 min) and the finish is short. It is a quite disappointing Barbaresco even if compared to other cheaper Nebbiolo grapes. This wine is surprisingly un-aromatic. My impression: NOTHING SPECIAL. Tasted Apr/10.

If you would like to see wines I recommend and that are still available at the LCBO, please visit this link (listed in my profile):

http://www.winealign.com/wino/dantrcka/recomended-wines-you-can-still-buy

8686
  • Thumbs-up (2)
  • Thumbs-down (1)

Visit my website www.grapeselections.com
Arnold Toporowski
Arnold Toporowski

bought this on Roger's recommendation, but I got the 2007 vintage (not the 2006). Never tried the 2006, so i don't know how it compares. I found the 2007 had a nice nose of plums and smoke, but in the mouth it was a little lacking in fruit, and tannic. Definately an old-school, needs-food kind of wine. Though I must say it was better the second day (air pumped out). Maybe it's age-worthy, but I'll never know since I won't be buying it again.

8686
  • Thumbs-up (1)
  • Thumbs-down (0)